Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Particulate Emissions Versus Global Warming

Project Syndicate (h/t Mark Thoma):
The combustion of fossil fuels, wood, and other biomass increases the amount of airborne particles, which, in a somewhat simplified manner, we can describe as “white” or “black.” Both types can be found in varying amounts in all emissions. Most black particles stem from small-scale and inefficient burning of biofuels, and, in Asia and Africa, from the burning of agricultural waste. By contrast, white particles consist largely of sulfur from the burning of coal and oil.
CommentsBecause black particles contain soot and absorb sunlight, they are believed to increase global warming. White particles, however, reflect some of the incoming sunlight back into space, producing a cooling effect on Earth’s climate.
CommentsIndeed, according to the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the cooling effect of white particles may counteract as much as about half of the warming effect of carbon dioxide. So, if all white particles were removed from the atmosphere, global warming would increase considerably.
CommentsThe dilemma is that all particles, whether white or black, constitute a serious problem for human health. Every year, an estimated two million people worldwide die prematurely, owing to the effects of breathing polluted air. Furthermore, sulfur-rich white particles contribute to the acidification of soil and water.
Unfortunately, I think we're going to be screwed no matter what as far as global warming goes.  I get the feeling we're getting into that famed hockey stick stage, and in a few years we'll be cussing the climate change deniers.  Hopefully I'm wrong.  Again.  As far as ag is concerned, some people are considering what may be coming (h/t Big Picture Ag):
Scientists at Stanford University in California and Purdue University in Indiana say global warming is going to hit hard in Corn Belt states where it most matters — the corn market. The study, financed by the U.S. Department of Energy, says that the corn market will be walloped in the coming years by climate change.

Factors such as market policies or oil prices have comparatively little effect on corn prices compared to global warming, the study says. In fact, heat waves sparked by rising global temperatures are expected to become more common, withering crops in the Midwest, scientists say.

Farmers would be forced to increase their crops’ heat tolerance or move northward to farm near the Canadian border to avoid the heat waves.

“Severe heat is the big hammer,” Noah Diffenbaugh, an assistant Stanford professor of environmental Earth system science, has said in recent media interviews. “These are substantial changes in price volatility that come from relatively moderate global warming.”

“U.S. corn-price volatility exhibits higher sensitivity to near-term climate change than to energy policy influences or agriculture-energy market integration,” wrote researchers Diffenbaugh, Thomas Hertel, Martin Scherer and Monika Verma in the article published on Sunday.
That's my big concern, changes in climate making the land we've got less productive.

No comments:

Post a Comment